Both the Royal Enfield Classic 350 and the Royal Enfield Himalayan have their own strengths and are suitable for different purposes. Here's a comparison to help you decide which one is better for city and tour use:
City Use:
- Classic 350: The Classic 350 is a more compact and lighter motorcycle compared to the Himalayan, making it easier to maneuver in city traffic and navigate through narrow streets. Its lower seat height and more upright riding position can provide better comfort for daily commuting.
- Himalayan: The Himalayan, with its taller stance and long-travel suspension, is designed to handle rough terrains and off-road conditions. While it may not be as nimble in heavy city traffic as the Classic 350, it offers a commanding riding position that provides good visibility and can handle uneven surfaces and potholes more effectively.
Touring Use:
- Classic 350: The Classic 350's comfortable riding position, relaxed ergonomics, and torquey engine make it a suitable choice for long-distance cruising. It has a traditional design, which some riders find appealing for touring purposes.
- Himalayan: The Himalayan is purpose-built for adventure touring and offers features specifically designed for extended trips. Its long-travel suspension, robust frame, upright riding position, and larger fuel tank capacity (around 15 liters) provide better stability, comfort, and the ability to tackle varied terrains.
Ultimately, the best choice between the Classic 350 and Himalayan for city and tour use depends on your specific preferences and riding requirements. If you prioritize maneuverability in the city and occasional touring, the Classic 350 might be a better fit. On the other hand, if you plan to undertake longer and more adventurous tours with a focus on off-road capability, the Himalayan would be a more suitable option. I recommend taking test rides of both models to get a firsthand experience and make an informed decision based on your personal preferences and needs.